Data Collection Methods
To derive conclusions from data, we need to know how the data
were collected; that is, we need to know the method(s)
of data collection.
Methods of Data Collection
There are four main methods of data collection.
- Census. A census is a study that obtains data
from every member of a
population.
In most studies, a census is not practical, because of the
cost and/or time required.
- Sample survey. A sample survey is a study
that obtains data from a subset of a population, in order
to estimate population attributes.
- Experiment. An experiment is a controlled
study in which the researcher attempts to understand
cause-and-effect relationships. The study is "controlled" in
the sense that the researcher controls (1) how subjects are
assigned to groups and (2) which treatments each group
receives.
In the analysis phase, the researcher compares group scores on
some
dependent variable.
Based on the analysis, the researcher draws a conclusion about
whether the treatment
(
independent variable) had a causal effect on the
dependent variable.
- Observational study. Like experiments,
observational studies attempt to understand cause-and-effect
relationships. However, unlike experiments, the researcher
is not able to control (1) how subjects are
assigned to groups and/or (2) which treatments each group
receives.
Data Collection Methods: Pros and Cons
Each method of data collection has advantages and disadvantages.
- Resources. When the population is large, a
sample survey has a big resource advantage
over a census. A well-designed
sample survey can provide very precise estimates of population
parameters - quicker, cheaper, and with less
manpower than a census.
- Generalizability. Generalizability refers to the
appropriateness of applying findings from a study to a larger
population. Generalizability requires random selection. If
participants in a study are randomly selected from a larger
population, it is appropriate to generalize study results to
the larger population; if not, it is not appropriate to generalize.
Observational studies do not feature random selection; so generalizing
from the results of an observational
study to a larger population can be a problem.
- Causal inference. Cause-and-effect
relationships can be teased out when subjects are
randomly assigned to groups. Therefore, experiments, which allow
the researcher to control assignment of subjects to treatment
groups, are
the best method for investigating causal relationships.
Test Your Understanding of This Lesson
Problem
Which of the following statements are true?
I. A sample survey is an example of an experimental study.
II. An observational study requires fewer resources than an experiment.
III. The best method for investigating causal relationships is an
observational study.
(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) III only
(D) All of the above.
(E) None of the above.
Solution
The correct answer is (E). In a sample survey, the researcher does
not assign treatments to survey respondents. Therefore, a sample
survey is not an experimental study; rather, it is an observational
study. An observational study may or may not require fewer
resources (time, money, manpower) than an experiment. The best
method for investigating causal relationships is an experiment - not
an observational study - because an experiment features randomized
assignment of subjects to treatment groups.